Status: AVAILABLE |
In order to read or download spanish for xenophobes speak the lingo by speaking english xenophobes guides xenophobes phrase books ebook, you need to create a FREE account.
Download Now! |
eBook includes PDF, ePub and Kindle version
| ✔ Register a free 1 month Trial Account. |
| ✔ Download as many books as you like (Personal use) |
| ✔ Cancel the membership at any time if not satisfied. |
| ✔ Join Over 80000 Happy Readers |
It looks like your browser needs updating. For the best experience on Quizlet, please update your browser. Learn More. Kigali, 1994 What items are in the crate that drops. Machetes What is the radio telling Hutus to do.Someone that didn't like him turned him in as a spy.We are peacekeepers, not peacemakers. Learn More A Belgian Hotel: The Milles Collines What European country colonized Rwanda. Belgium What did the rebels use as a signal to start the killing.The Hutu rebels Besides guns what weapon was used to kill people.Bribes the soldier and takes them to the hotel Who was in the white van that the Red Cross volunteer brought. Tutsi children Why couldn't Colonel Oliver take the orphans. He was only allowed to take whites Why did the rebels target Tutsi children. To wipe out the future Tutsi generation Why did all the white people leave and the soldiers wouldn't take the Rwandans away to safety. Because the Belgians do not care about the Africans What does Paul ask the hotel guests to do to get help. Call their families and tell them goodbye, hoping they will try and help them. What does George say about the Tutsi. They will soon be dead When Paul falls out of the car, what does he land on.His frustration with his tie caused him to finally break down after all the past events Why did Paul have to keep the hotel open. Because otherwise the people would be killed What makes Paul a good man. He tries to remain calm and comforting, and protect his friends and family Why did Paul tell his wife to have her and her kids jump off the roof if he died. Because he did not want his children to see him die Why didn't Paul get into the UN truck and leave with his family. Because he wanted to stay with those not leaving What did Paul use to bribe the general for help.Belgium What is the only trait that distinguishes Hutus from Tutsis today.Why was Paul's family threatened by the attacks.Why do the warring sides not mess with those aid workers.
http://www.hydraforceleads.com/userfiles/hydrovane-25-compressor-manual.xml
Congo When Paul's neighbor is attacked at the beginning of the movie, he did not attempt to help them. What reason did he give his wife for not helping.Rwandan President's plane shot down, President killed, Tutsis blamed term for someone who must flee to another country, and must be either invited or recognized by the UN to relocate. How does this particular technique establishDoes this strike you asHow is this political, historicalDo you find this scene credible? How does the UN Colonel comment on this decision? How does he respond to Paul's question about theRwanda itself?To what degree does it address the. The current custom error settings for this application prevent the details of the application error from being viewed remotely (for security reasons). It could, however, be viewed by browsers running on the local server machine. Learn about Easel TOOLS Easel Activities Pre-made digital activities. Add highlights, virtual manipulatives, and more. Browse Easel Activities Easel Assessments Quizzes with auto-grading that will be available for purchase on TpT soon. Some filters moved to Formats filters, which is at the top of the page. See All Resource Types All Resource Types Activities Assessment Cooperative Learning Cultural Activities DBQs Examinations - Quizzes Fun Stuff Google Apps Handouts Homework Internet Activities Lectures Lesson Plans (Bundled) Lesson Plans (Individual) Minilessons Movie Guides Multimedia Outlines Posters PowerPoint Presentations Printables Projects Research Study Guides Unit Plans Video Files Webquests Whole Courses Workbooks Worksheets Don't see what you looking for. Included: 2 page reading assignment, with 17 document-based questions, viewing guide for the film Hotel Rwanda (excellent movie!), character guide for the film. Includes engaging questions and a full written response assignment at the end. Each one is 20 questions long and comes with an answer key and answer strip for easy grading.
http://alice-immo.com/userfiles/hydrovane-13-manual.xml
Students will fill out this worksheet throughout the duration of the video. This product DOES NOT come with an answer key. The answers can vary based on application. These two essential questions must then be backed up with specific examples from the film, and recorded by students as they watch the film (or afterward). It is split up into four sections with fill-in-the-blank questions. Each section has a word bank. The inclusion of different types of activities is a ploy to appeal to students' different learning styles, and mixed abilities. Also included is the answer key. Including a discussion this takes 3-4 days, depending on the length of your class periods. The teacher will be required to buy or rent the movie. Version A should be given to advanced students and Version B should be given to struggling students. Keys for both are included. It will give students in a World Cultures or Geography class grasp the basic physical features present in Africa and how the continent's geography changed it's cultural development. This video is an excellent example of effects of genocide on a nation and the relationships between other nations around the world in a time of crisis. Similar to Schindler, he is able to save many lives because of his position in power. I also included the PA state standards that the activity addresses. It is designed to facilitate discussion with boxes for students to take notes on sounds, images, and meaning and discussion questions after each clip. I have divided the film into 6 parts, each of which is about 20 minutes long. Some of the questions are basic fact-finding.
https://congviendisan.vn/vi/ic-32at-service-manual
Others require students to understand why characters Subjects: English Language Arts, Social Studies - History, African History Grades: 7 th - 12 th Types: Worksheets, Movie Guides, Activities Also included in: Hotel Rwanda Study Guide - Active Learning Tasks Bundle Show more details Add to cart Wish List showing 1 - 24 of 81 results 1 2 3 4 Next Teachers Pay Teachers is an online marketplace where teachers buy and sell original educational materials. Are you getting the free resources, updates, and special offers we send out every week in our teacher newsletter? Sign Up. See All Resource Types All Resource Types Activities Assessment Handouts Homework Lesson Plans (Individual) Movie Guides Multimedia PowerPoint Presentations Printables Video Files Whole Courses Workbooks Worksheets Don't see what you looking for. I've had success by having students compare the Rwandan Genocide to the Holocaust and the Armenian Genocide. The worksheet asks students to analyze a political cartoon about the Rwandan Genocide and the world's reaction.Are you getting the free resources, updates, and special offers we send out every week in our teacher newsletter? Sign Up. Available from Amazon.com. See also TWM’s Historical Fiction in Film Cross-Curricular Homework Project. From April to July 1994, some 927,000 Tutsi and moderate Hutu were shot or hacked to death.Like “ Schindler’s List,” this movie paints an inspiring portrait of one man’s evolving moral conviction and how, using his wits and charm, he held maniacal killers at bay. In addition, the film describes the situation of three fictional survivors. Martine, a teacher at a Catholic girls’ school, lives with the memory of seeing her class massacred. Augustin is a Hutu who had married a Tutsi. His wife and sons were murdered trying to escape. His daughter was a student in Martine’s class. Augustin’s brother, Honore, was a hate-mongering announcer for Radio RTLM.
As the story begins, Honore is on trial before the International War Crimes Tribunal for inciting people to commit genocide. Scenes of documented atrocities are recreated in the movie, including: the murder of young girls at a Catholic school, Hutu and Tutsi alike, when the Hutu girls refused to give up their Tutsi classmates; the killing of moderate Hutu Prime Minister Agathe Uwilingiyimana; and the repatriation of mostly white foreign nationals by French and Belgian troops, leaving a group of Tutsis to their fate at the hands of waiting genocidaires. “Sometimes in April” shows the three survivors trying to deal with the effects of the genocide. The film shows a gacaca (pronounced ga-cha-ca), a Truth and Reconciliation style village meeting used to reintegrate low-level killers into society without further punishment. It also shows proceedings at the International Criminal Tribunal in Arusha at which the leaders of the Rwandan genocide are being tried for crimes against humanity. Bagosora, Pamela Nomvete as Martine, Debra Winger as Prudence Bushnell. The film raises questions of guilt, punishment, forgiveness, and reconciliation that Rwandans must still resolve. It is an excellent lesson in courage. “Hotel Rwanda” also describes the difficult position of peacekeeping forces when they are not supported by the U.N. and the international community. By focusing on the daring of Mr. Rusesabagina and the survival of the refugees at the Mille Collines, “Hotel Rwanda” provides a cushioned introduction to the horrifying subject of the Rwandan genocide. After the Holocaust the world said “Never again.” However, since 1945, humanity has repeatedly stood by and let genocide occur. (At present the world is struggling with a genocide in Darfur.) Students can explore the history and dynamics of genocide and issues of justice and forgiveness on a personal and national level.
These films can also promote discussions of the potential for peacekeeping, as well as the responsibilities of individuals and the media in times of crisis. However, there is no gratuitous violence, and care has been taken to avoid making the images too graphic. Scenes of people being killed with machetes are shot from a distance. But depictions of genocide are upsetting. Sensitive children might be disturbed by either of these movies. Hotel Rwanda focuses on the heroism of one man, and while his heroism is important, the story of the Rwandan genocide is about some 927,000 people being murdered by their countrymen, friends, and neighbors. Immediately after the movie, ask the Quick Discussion Question for that film. Then at odd times over the next week (for example at the dinner table or in the car on the way to school), bring up one of the other Discussion Questions. Don’t worry if you can only get through a few questions. Just taking the film seriously and discussing it a little is the key. Allow your children to watch these movies several times on their own if they want. They have the same cultural heritage, including a common national mythology which enshrines the origins and historical relationships of their three peoples: the Hutu (85 of the population); the Tutsi (14); and the Twa, or Pygmy (1). Each was given a pot of milk. Gatwa drank all of his. Gahutu spilled his. But Gatutsi, demonstrating his natural superiority, kept his safe. So the king put Gatutsi in charge of all. The word Hutu originally meant “servant” or “subject” and the word Tutsi meant “rich in cattle.” In general, but with many exceptions, the Tutsi were taller and had sharper features. The Hutu (again generally and with many exceptions) were shorter with larger noses and blunter features. Tutsi tended cattle, and were overlords. Hutu farmed the land and were regarded as peasants.The peace treaty ending WWI, gave a League of Nations “trusteeship” over the colony to Belgium.
The Tutsi, who looked more European to the colonizers, were seen as natural aristocrats and were favored in government and society. Employing a “divide and rule” strategy, the Belgians used the Tutsi to help them control the Hutu. Identity cards were issued with Hutu and Tutsi as “ethnic” designations in 1926. The Belgians turned the government of Rwanda over to the majority Hutu, who promptly reversed the preferences that the Tutsi had enjoyed. After independence in 1962, it was Tutsi children who were excluded from school and Tutsi adults who could not get government jobs. Some of the massacres were very large, with 200,000 Hutu and Tutsi being killed in Burundi in 1993. Due to repression and recurring massacres, half the Tutsi population of Rwanda had fled to neighboring countries by 1994. Many Hutu from Burundi, radicalized by the conflict in their own country, had fled to Rwanda. This set the stage for the Hutu-dominated Rwandan government to paint all Tutsis as traitors. The government condoned or actually sponsored outbreaks of violence against the Tutsi. The RPF was better trained and had a brilliant general, Paul Kagame. By 1993, the RPF was a real threat to the Hutu-dominated Rwandan government. The UN passed a resolution creating the UN Assistance Mission for Rwanda (UNAMIR) under a Chapter VI mandate to assist in implementing the Arusha Accords. (Peacekeepers operating under Chapter VI of the U.N. Charter may only use force if they are attacked and only to defend themselves.) General Romeo Dallaire of Canada was appointed Force Commander. He first arrived in Rwanda on an information-gathering mission with little more than a map and an encyclopedia article on Rwanda. Dallaire requested 5,000 peacekeeping troops but was granted only 2,500.
It was launched in Kigali, the capital of Rwanda, on April 7, 1994, when the plane carrying Rwandan president Habyarimana, and Burundian President Ntaryamira (also a Hutu) was shot down by a handheld, ground to air missile. The genocide ended only when the RPF completed its conquest of the country on July 18, 1994. Many genocidaires were embedded in the stream of refugees. International humanitarian aid poured in to prevent famine and disease in the camps. This had the undesired effect of bolstering the Hutu extremists, who wound up as de facto leaders of the refugees. They continued their aggression from the camps. The new Rwandan government, now dominated by Tutsi, has itself launched incursions into neighboring countries. Instability and warfare within the neighboring Democratic Republic of the Congo and Burundi have resulted in four million deaths in the Great Lakes Region of Africa in the decade since the Rwandan genocide. Rwandan courts started trying people suspected of planning the genocide in 1996. In 1998, some condemned prisoners were publicly executed. At the time, these executions were considered therapeutic. Gacaca hearings were traditionally used to address relatively minor property disputes within villages. They stress truth-telling and accountability. The dynamic of this “justice on the grass” has worked well in South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation process. But Rwanda’s wounds are far more traumatic and the current government’s commitment to human rights is not as strong as the commitment of Nelson Mandela’s government in South Africa. Unfortunately, “justice on the grass” has proven inadequate to deal with the wounds of genocide. The gacaca program has now virtually collapsed. For a critical look at how the gacaca courts have failed and a list of references on the web, see Gacaca Courts in Post-Genocide Rwanda by Radha Webley.
The Rwandan government has also instituted a program to cut in half the sentences of convicted genocidaires who confess and cooperate with authorities. These programs removed about half of the prisoners from Rwanda’s overcrowded jails. They not only freed prisoners but also relieved their families of a tremendous burden. When a person is imprisoned in Rwanda, the family must provide food. The prisons only accept food during the days. This usually means that the spouse cannot work, a factor which further impoverishes the family of the prisoner. Paul Rusesabagina, April 4, 2006 Lecture, Los Angeles, CA. RPF general Paul Kagame served as the unelected president of Rwanda from 2000 to 2003. In August of that year, Kagame was elected president with an incredible 95 of the vote. Observers charge that he won through intimidation and by outlawing the opposition party. See “ Kagame won, a Little Too Well “. We must, therefore, understand the causes of the problem, confront them, and address them. It plays a central role. It tells us about our history. It tells us about the present and it tells us about the future as well, informing us that if we are to move into the future with hope, there are certain issues that we must address without question. Otherwise, there is always a danger that if we do things wrong, there is a possibility of sliding back. I am sure that all the people of Rwanda, irrespective of their backgrounds, would not wish that to happen again. It caused a disaster for everyone. There is nobody in Rwanda who did not suffer from this bad period in our history. So reason will have to prevail in informing everyone that we cannot have a repeat of this kind of thing at any cost. He claims that approximately 5 of the public revenue is allocated to relief for victims of the genocide. It pays for school fees, shelter, and medical treatment for victims. He states that he would like to do more but Rwanda is a poor country.
President Kagame is also critical of the International Criminal Tribunal in Arusha. It has spent more than six hundred million dollars and has processed only a handful of cases. Persons with high positions in the government threatened his life to obtain an advantage in a business transaction. Mr. Rusesabagina now lives in Belgium. He ridicules Kagame’s claim that he received 95 of the vote in a free election and charges that Kagame is behaving like any other African despot.Small arms imported from countries such as Egypt, South Africa, and Poland were used in the attacks. Farm implements were used to kill. But it is the infamous machetes (one for every three Hutu males) that are forever identified with the horror of the slaughter. The killing occurred face-to-face. The killers were often spattered with the blood of their victims. The planners of the genocide agreed on a system of communications that would work “under the radar screen”: whistles, runners, and secret meetings. Their victims were often neighbors, students, patients, and parishioners. Sometimes the victims were family members. Children would be killed in front of their parents. The genocidaires sometimes forced their victims to kill before they themselves were killed. Parents would be required to kill their own children. Neighbor would be required to kill neighbor. Friend would be required to kill friend. A large part of the populace was either incited, deputized, or forced to kill. Some victims were killed slowly. First, the tendons in their legs would be cut so that they could not run away. Then an arm would be severed and the victim left for a while. The killers would then return and severe another limb.The following eye-witness descriptions from General Dallaire, the Commander of UNAMIR, are haunting. You may not want to read them to students. You may not want to read them yourself: I saw so many faces and try now to remember each one. The legs bent apart.
A broken bottle, a rough branch, even a knife between them. Where the bodies were fresh, we saw what must have been semen pooled on and near the dead women and girls. There was always a lot of blood. They died in a position of total vulnerability, flat on their backs with their legs bent and knees wide apart. It was the expressions on their dead faces that assaulted me the most, a frieze of shock, pain, and humiliation. For many years after I came home, I banished the memories of those faces from my mind, but they have come back, all too clearly.” Shake Hands with the Devil, p. 430. At that point, the RPF had not yet reached the capital Kigali and Dallaire had to cross a river to get to Kagame’s headquarters. Getting out of my vehicle, I noticed a number of soldiers with long poles upstream, pulling bloated bodies up on the bank. To me this was now such a commonplace sight it did not penetrate my protective screen. As we made our way across on foot, I noticed that clothes were caught between the struts of the floating base and I stopped to look over the side. Staring up at me were the faces of half-nude corpses, stuck under the bridge. There were a lot of them. In some places they had accumulated to the point that we were actually walking on a bridge of dead bodies. On the far bank, soldiers were trying to pry them loose for fear that their weight would pull the bridge apart. The screen shattered, my stomach heaved and I struggled for composure. I couldn’t bear the movements of the bridge, up and down on the slaughtered hundreds. Dallaire, Shake Hands With the Devil p. 431. Eyewitnesses were in denial. They believed that the high-pitched screams they were hearing were wind gusts, that the packs of dogs at the roadside were feeding on animal remains and not dismembered corpses, that the smells enveloping them emanated from spoiled food and not decomposing bodies.In addition, Rwanda’s fate did not affect the interests of any world power.
It has no oil, nor does it have iron, steel, diamonds, or other natural resources. Its location is not strategic. Many of the available well-trained troops would be from developed countries and would be white. The intervention might then appear to be a colonial venture. In addition, allowing genocide to occur on any part of the globe reduces the level of national and international political morality. (In contrast, Gandhi’s non-violent movement for independence in India raised the level of world-wide political ethics. See Learning Guide to “Gandhi”.) As discussed below, relatively few foreign troops, a total of 5,000, would have been enough to stop the genocide. It was seen as a failure to recognize long-term, important goals in favor of short-term, relatively minor goals. President Habyarimana had lost control of the Hutu extremists, whose plans were being finalized under the leadership of Rwandan Army Colonel Theodore Bagosora. Jean-Pierre had also talked about plans to trap and kill Belgian peacekeepers to force the U.N. to withdraw. In his cable, which came to be known as The Dallaire Fax, the Canadian General proposed to raid the weapons caches. Despite the fact that the veracity of the informant was confirmed by the U.N. Secretary General’s personal representative in Kigali, U.N. headquarters in New York denied Dallaire permission to raid the caches.Joyce Leader, deputy chief of the U.S. Mission in Kigali, recalls that early on the morning after President Habyarimana’s plane was shot down, “People were calling me and telling me who was getting killed. I knew they were going door-to-door.” She explained to her colleagues at the State Department that “three kinds of killing were going on: casualties in war, politically motivated murder (moderate and opposition Hutu) and genocide.” Power, Bystanders to Genocide, Atlantic Monthly, September 2001. Ten Belgian peacekeepers had been tortured and killed by the extremists on the first day of the genocide.
(Right on schedule according to the plan disclosed by “Jean-Pierre”.) When their mutilated bodies were sent home on April 14, Belgium appealed to the U.S. to call for a withdrawal of all peacekeeping forces. Belgium did not want to be seen as the lone country abandoning the Rwandans.The soldiers never materialized. Three years after the genocide, the Carnegie Commission on Preventing Deadly Conflict, Georgetown University, and the U.S. Army made an intensive study of Dallaire’s proposal, using a panel of international experts. In Rwanda, a window of opportunity for the employment of such a force extended roughly from about April 7 to April 21, 1994, when the political leaders of the violence were still susceptible to international influence. The rapid introduction of robust combat forces, authorized to seize at one time critical points throughout the country, would have changed the political calculations of the participants. Additional forces may have been required to solidify the initial success and maintain order.” The primary practical response was to reduce UNAMIR to less than 500 troops, not to increase the force levels so that it could effectively intervene. Even when the U.N. belatedly agreed to ask member countries to send the 5,000 troops and the equipment that they would need, nothing significant materialized. For example, the U.S. was to provide the armored personnel carriers for the troops but the Army imposed so many bureaucratic delays that APCs didn’t reach Rwanda before the end of the genocide. Had the international community acted promptly, hundreds of thousands, perhaps as many as 500,000 lives could have been saved. The commandments, like Hitler’s Nuremberg laws and the precepts of the Bosnia Serbs, smeared and branded the minority (Tutsi) as traitorous, second class citizens, and called for the limitation of their rights. Power, A Problem from Hell pg 338.
Formally called Radio Television Libre Mille Collines, radio RTLM was known in the international community as “Hate Radio.” Transistor radios had become cheap and widely available in Rwanda just before the beginning of the genocide. Radio RTLM was financed by Hutu extremists, including President Habyarimana, his wife, and her associates. Radio RTLM incited the Hutu people to exterminate the Inyenzi (“cockroaches”). You knew you had to change your address at once.” Power, A Problem from Hell p. 7. The responses ranged from “too difficult technically” to “too expensive” to “we can’t interfere with free speech, especially in another country.” However, the International War Crimes Tribunal has ruled that RTLM managers and announcers were guilty of crimes against humanity. Inciting and facilitating genocide is not protected speech. Dallaire was acutely aware of the importance of the media. When the expatriates were being evacuated, he persuaded a BBC reporter to stay by allowing him to live in the U.N. compound, guaranteeing him protection, and promising him a story a day. Dallaire, Shake Hands with the Devil, p. 332. Samantha Power quotes Dallaire as saying: “A reporter with a line to the West was worth a battalion on the ground,” and, “at that point, the journalists were really all I had”. But some reporters fell into the same trap as the diplomats who specialized in Africa, interpreting the violence as one more manifestation of ancient tribal hatreds, rather than a new phenomenon created by extremist politicians.A genocide is never accidental. It is always planned and requires a hierarchy of command to execute. (In the case of Rwanda, the extremist Hutu government and its sympathizers probably began planning the 1994 genocide years before it occurred.) It requires a ruthless government that can crush and silence opposition, rally an efficient killing force, identify the target group, manipulate the media, and parry any thrusts of intervention from the outside world.
It requires people who are willing to kill and many good people who stand by and do nothing. Many people would say that the death of an individual wild animal is regrettable, but the annihilation of an entire species of animal or plant is something we must work to avoid in the name of biodiversity. Extinction, cultural or biological, is forever. However, it is also true that there are conditions and forces which lead people to abandon their morality and embrace evil. After all, the vast majority of Rwandans (93.6) claim to be Christians. CIA Factbook Article on Rwanda What happened? Rwandans killed their neighbors just to take their houses, people killed people for their banana trees, people leaped over the counters of abandoned general stores and started selling the merchandise as if they were the rightful owners.” These activities went on without the perpetrators being called to account. See Sibomana, Hope for Rwanda, p. 105). Although the first language of all Rwandans is Kinyarwanda, France was in favor of maintaining the French-speaking, or Francophone, government. The Tutsi rebels had grown up in Anglophone (English speaking) Uganda; There were people in the streets who I had known seven years, neighbors of mine who had come over to our place for our regular Sunday cookouts. These people were wearing military uniforms that had been handed out by the militia. They were holding machetes and were trying to get inside the houses of those they knew to be Tutsi, those who had Tutsi relatives, or those who refused to go along with the murders.Rusesabagina asks why, and proposes an answer, They were told they would never be as physically attractive or as capable of running the affairs of the country. It was a poisonous stream of rhetoric designed to reinforce the power of the elite. When the Hutus came to power they spoke evil words of their own, fanning the old resentments, exciting the hysterical dark places in the heart. Ibid.