Status: AVAILABLE |
In order to read or download boss hf 2 manual ebook, you need to create a FREE account.
Download Now! |
eBook includes PDF, ePub and Kindle version
| ✔ Register a free 1 month Trial Account. |
| ✔ Download as many books as you like (Personal use) |
| ✔ Cancel the membership at any time if not satisfied. |
| ✔ Join Over 80000 Happy Readers |
Our payment security system encrypts your information during transmission. We don’t share your credit card details with third-party sellers, and we don’t sell your information to others. Please try again.Please try again.In order to navigate out of this carousel please use your heading shortcut key to navigate to the next or previous heading. Register a free business account Please try your search again later.However, the Fromel Supreme kit unleashes the robust, throbbing flange of the HF-2, while retaining the clarity and warmth of your original tone. With these mods you can dial in everything from subtle filtered flavors to psychotic swirling madness.Eliminate Noise - The supreme mod kit replaces all the cheap electrolytic caps with high quality film caps so your tone is un-restricted and full of power. If you have basic soldering skills and can follow directions this is an easy projectAmazon calculates a product’s star ratings based on a machine learned model instead of a raw data average. The model takes into account factors including the age of a rating, whether the ratings are from verified purchasers, and factors that establish reviewer trustworthiness. However, the Fromel Supreme kit unleashes the robust, throbbing flange of the HF-2, while retaining the clarity and warmth of your original tone. In your pedal’s “born again” state, you can dial in everything from subtle filtered flavors to psychotic swirling madness. Your guitars natural tone will be preserved instead of being lost in a wash. Eliminate Noise - The supreme mod kit replaces all the cheap electrolytic caps with high quality film caps so your tone is un-restricted and full of power. Know your speed A special dual LED will glow Red in time with the rate knob when bypassed. When the effect is engaged, the LED turns Blue. Vintage Flanging You can tune the HF-2 to sound very similar to the vintage MXR flanger, parts and instructions are included for this option.
http://nutronicltd.com/userfiles/boss-gt-6-manual-portugues.xml
PSA Power Supply Many HF-2’s only work with the old style Boss ACA power adapter. The Supreme mod kit converts the pedal to run off the new standard Boss PSA power adapter. If you have basic soldering skills and can follow directions this is an easy project. Don't pay hundreds of dollars for a boutique flanger when you can transform your HF-2 for far less. This is a kit to modify your pedal and there is not a pedal included in this kit. Why you ask? We are no. This creates a unique flange that sounds a bit like the Boss BF-2, but far brighter. read more Just get a HF-2 because it simply beats out. MXR all iterations including famous EVH Signature Flanger. Strymons. Ibanez. Maxon I have the MiJ version from 1986; it is so warm, natural, lush, noiseless and tweakable. No other flanger does what HF-2 is capable of, really.It is of course my subjective point of view. After trying lots of flangers I've chosen this one. Great for you if you like other ones, they are great pedals without any doubt, too! It has a little noise and adds some colour to my tone but that's precisely what you expect to find in a analog modulation like this. This creates a unique flange that sounds a bit like the Boss BF-2, but far brighter and cleaner. Tweak your flanger with four simple controls to get the shimmer or languid, soupy sound you want - the Manual, Depth, Rate, and Res controls are sure to get you the singular flanger sound you're looking for. Follow this Product Overview Produced in Japan and Taiwan in the '80s, the Boss HF-2 Hi Band Flanger is designed to combine your original signal with the delayed signal shifted one octave up. This creates a unique flange that sounds a bit like the Boss BF-2, but far brighter and cleaner. Tweak your flanger with four simple controls to get the shimmer or languid, soupy sound you want - the Manual, Depth, Rate, and Res controls are sure to get you the singular flanger sound you're looking for.
http://ufcnagykanizsa.hu/userfiles/boss-gt-8-manual-download.xml
Gallery Product Specs Brand Boss Model HF-2 Hi Band Flanger (Green Label) Finish Pink Year 1985 - 1989 Made In Japan Show More Similar Products From the Price Guide Sell Yours Please check the fields highlighted in red.Currency. Follow this Product Overview Produced in Japan and Taiwan in the '80s, the Boss HF-2 Hi Band Flanger is designed to combine your original signal with the delayed signal shifted one octave up. This creates a unique flange that sounds a bit like the Boss BF-2, but far brighter and cleaner. Tweak your flanger with four simple controls to get the shimmer or languid, soupy sound you want - the Manual, Depth, Rate, and Res controls are sure to get you the singular flanger sound you're looking for. Gallery Product Specs Brand Boss Model HF-2 Hi Band Flanger (Green Label) Finish Pink Year 1985 - 1989 Made In Japan Show More Similar Products From the Price Guide Sell Yours Please check the fields highlighted in red.Currency. Made in japan, august 1988. While the “standard” Boss flanger may be and have been the BF-2 for decades, the HF-2 operates in slightly different manner. While most flangers mix the whole incoming signal with delayed duplicate (controlled by LFO to create the sweep), this Hi Band Flanger takes the incoming signal and splits it in two ways. Other stays as it is and the other is pushed to up octave which then has the flanging delay mixed into. Or so they say. That idea sure has some out of the box thinking in there. The old school board manufacturing methods always please the eye. The delay section of the flanger isn’t anything special. It ihas MN3102 for the clock and MN3204 512-stage Bucket Brigade Device for the delay. The schematic is available for download through the interwebs. Looking at schematic, i’m not exactly sure how that half of IC2 and Q2 are supposed to create the clean octave up, but it surely won’t act only as a buffer in front of the delay circuitry. Controls are very sufficient.
https://www.becompta.be/emploi/bosch-maxx-classic-manual
Manual affects the Rate and Depth, while Resonanse controls how much delayed, or flanged signal is getting in the mix with original signal. The footprint is pretty common with most flangers and choruses. It is a very nice sounding flanger that goes from mild detuned vibrato to airplane hights. Overall tone is still rather tasteless and scentless, the same problem we’re facing with many Boss boxes. Sure it sounds good, but it doesn’t quite reach that acidy velcro flanger wildness the greatest flangers reach. It does offer slight variance to most usual flangers, which is a good thing. Controls offer good variance in terms of speed and depth. For me, the best use for this is to have it act as a vibrato. I do get whyt some folks prefer this over any other, but that isn’t me. Good but somewhat boring. Pinging is currently not allowed.Great work! Seemed to give a bit more “movement” to the sound than the others. In order to post comments, please make sure JavaScript and Cookies are enabled, and reload the page. Click here for instructions on how to enable JavaScript in your browser. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser. There are reckoned to be a few early ones in pink, out in the wild, although I believe it's closer to the DC-3 you have.It almost has a pearl hue to it. View media item 103687 I always found the HF-2 a bit too scratchy but it might just be the way I was using it before. So I might find I like the HF-2 better for this. Anyone else find them both pretty noisy, but the HF-2 even more so. There's this white noise that seems to get louder while the flanger sweep drifts into the range of longer delay times, so it's more prominent on a lower manual setting.
http://ferienwohnung-dorsten.com/images/boss-hf-2-manual.pdf
I'm powering them both from gig rig power supplies, totally isolated, with gig rig ACA-AOK adaptors running at 12v, the way they were designed to be used, so it's not an issue with isolation or not receiving the correct voltage, either. Perhaps an issue with the calibration of the internal trimpots?I noticed it only after I did the Fromel mod because that got rid of nearly all the other white noise that was masking it.It almost has a pearl hue to it. View media item 103687 Most seem to be a satin finish, though. Anyway, enough thread drift. I see cases of folk discussing mods, and converting HF2 to BF2, and making it sound thicker, darker, more intense etc. Firstly, I would say 80's HF2 and BF2 are still widely available and cheap, and I would recommend getting one of each, because they are completely different beasts. It seems pointless trying to mod one to sound like the other. The BF2 is your bog standard, cool sounding analogue flanger. Enough said. The raison d'etre behind the HF2 is to impart subtle flanging, but more dramatic tone shaping. I won't make any claims to know how it does this, but it imparts a thinner, hollower, more trebly tone to your overall signal. By comparison you could say the BF2 sounds thicker, darker and fuller. Now, where the HF2 comes into its own, is with distortion or overdrive, because that tone shaping becomes quite apparent, and IMHO very musical. I would argue David Gilmour agrees. It seems to remove, or filter, a lot of the overtones and leaves you with a chimy, less busy, hollower sounding overdrive or lead tone. With clean guitar (and I recommend a compressor), it will sound very Chorus-ey, very much like a Boss CE1. So, I already dropped the Gilmour hint, who, everyone knows, uses a 70s EHX Electric Mistress in a lot of his work.The EM became famous for it's whispy, watery tone. In more extreme settings this could be quite harsh, metallic and unpleasant. But, those in the know rarely used the EM like this.
They kept the controls at sedate, sensible levels, and the beauty of the EM is revealed. But then, they didn't have that watery chime either. So, I would suggest you only buy an HF2, to be, an HF2. It is has it's own thing going on, which, if you like, can be put to good use. For a start, without any effort, you can get really authentic early CE1 and CE2 Chorus tones. Set the RES control to minimum, for CE2, set Manual just above minimum, for CE1 set it around 10 O'clock. Use Rate and Depth as usual. As a Flanger, it has its own voice. Anyone who owns a BF2 and a HF2 will notice this instantly. So, the HF2 is definitely a lot more subtle as far as the BF2 and flanging in general is concerned. So if you want wild, swoopy and swooshy jet plane flyovers, it's probably not for you. I suspect this is also largely to do with the HF2's 512 stage BBD chip, compared to the 1024 stage BBDs of the BF2, the EM, and many other analogue Flangers. It goes back to the HF2 subtlety and limited range. The EM could get very wild and chaotic, the HF2 can't. But then, some EM users only used the EM subtly, David Gilmour for one, and on some songs, Andy Summers, where people still do think he was using a Chorus pedal, but it was in fact an EM. Let's just get some technical comparisons out of the way. The EM used a Hyper-Triangular (or semi inverted sine wave) LFO. This is certainly a unique signature sound of the EM, because practically every other Flanger of the era used a Sine Wave LFO, which provides a constant smooth up down up down, and seems to linger on the transitions. The HF2 uses a Sine Wave LFO. So, the HF2 resembles an EM, when the EM is used with its more sedate control settings. That is Low Speed (Rate), Low Depth (Range) and Low Resonance (Colour). But you could that with a BF2. Sure, you could mimic the speed, depth and resonance, BUT, you couldn't mimic the TONE. The TONE is the real secret sauce of the EM.
www.cmevalves.com/pictures/files/colorado-traffic-accident-manual.pdf
And that is why I use an HF2 and not a BF2 or Mooer ELady for Floyd stuff.But the HF2, although not a copy, has that thin, whispy, watery tone I am looking for.According to what I read elsewhere the HF-2 shifts part of the signal up an octave before flanging, which accounts for its characteristic tone. As for the waveform, the Alexander F-13 and Neo versions use the same sort of Hypertriangular wave, so they may be able to get into the zone. According to what I read elsewhere the HF-2 shifts part of the signal up an octave before flanging, which accounts for its characteristic tone. As for the waveform, the Alexander F-13 and Neo versions use the same sort of Hypertriangular wave, so they may be able to get into the zone.The amount of delay is modulated shorter-longer. Depending on where the min-max delay times are, then you get the characteristic flanging sound sweeping through the frequency bands.Then Boss after that.The amount of delay is modulated shorter-longer. Depending on where the min-max delay times are, then you get the characteristic flanging sound sweeping through the frequency bands.The HF2 controls, relative to the BF2 also have a shorter scope. For example:- Manual HF2 min to max is approx equivalent to the BF2 11 O'clock to Max. Depth HF2 min to max is approx equivalent to BF2 min to 1 O'Clock. Rate HF2 min to max is approx equivalent to BF2 min to 2 O'Clock. The BF2 can get a lot faster. Res HF2 min to max is approx equivalent to BF2 min to 2 O'clock. The HF2 doesn't go into self oscillation.I really love this pedal too and have used it into the front of overdriven amp, where I normally put all modulation in amps effect loop. There is a lot of swirly chaotic analogue detail on the BF2, and I dare say grit. This is what I mean when I say it sounds thicker and darker, and really fattens up a lead tone if you keep the controls fairly sober.The HF2 controls, relative to the BF2 also have a shorter scope.
For example:- Manual HF2 min to max is approx equivalent to the BF2 11 O'clock to Max. Depth HF2 min to max is approx equivalent to BF2 min to 1 O'Clock. Rate HF2 min to max is approx equivalent to BF2 min to 2 O'Clock. The BF2 can get a lot faster. Res HF2 min to max is approx equivalent to BF2 min to 2 O'clock. The HF2 doesn't go into self oscillation.BF-2 flanging effect is lower in pitch purely to do with the slower range of delay times it is more pronounced and thus more audible, less subtle, stronger.It is that but at the fast end ( 4ms upwards is getting into chorus territory with resonance at zero (CCW). CE1 and CE2 chorus times are around 4ms-10ms ish there or thereabouts, others are much slower (deeper almost seasick). EM is also in that very fast short end out to maybe 8ms or so. BF-2 doesn't quite get short enough to do that EM thing. Any other differences in knob setting vs audible sound is purely due to that one thing The HF2 controls, relative to the BF2 also have a shorter scope. For example:- Manual HF2 min to max is approx equivalent to the BF2 11 O'clock to Max. Depth HF2 min to max is approx equivalent to BF2 min to 1 O'Clock. Rate HF2 min to max is approx equivalent to BF2 min to 2 O'Clock. The BF2 can get a lot faster. Res HF2 min to max is approx equivalent to BF2 min to 2 O'clock. The HF2 doesn't go into self oscillation.Two things I’m curious about: 1. Is the max delay clockwise or counterclockwise? 2. Does anyone know the actual delay (Manual) ranges for either the HF-2 or BF-2? Two things I’m curious about: 1. Is the max delay clockwise or counterclockwise? 2. Does anyone know the actual delay (Manual) ranges for either the HF-2 or BF-2?I have another Boss HF2 and a Boss CH1 on loan to my brother. You can see all my other modulation stuff scattered around. Manual max, Res minimum in Chorus Mode. I set equivalent Rate and Depth on both and recorded to hear different timbres from each pedal. Recording Dry, HF2 and BF2 is last.
Manual max, Res minimum in Chorus Mode. I set equivalent Rate and Depth on both and recorded to hear different timbres from each pedal. Recording Dry, HF2 and BF2 is last. Everyone uses the same settings to show how different they sound. If you want Chorusy then either will fulfill that, each has their own thing otherwise. The HF2 controls, relative to the BF2 also have a shorter scope. For example:- Manual HF2 min to max is approx equivalent to the BF2 11 O'clock to Max. Depth HF2 min to max is approx equivalent to BF2 min to 1 O'Clock. Rate HF2 min to max is approx equivalent to BF2 min to 2 O'Clock. The BF2 can get a lot faster. Res HF2 min to max is approx equivalent to BF2 min to 2 O'clock. The HF2 doesn't go into self oscillation.I bet you could get the same sound with the BF, with the HF depth at noon it probably isn't reaching its faster delay time anyway, but just watch how low down the BF-2 sweep goes, Depth might have right be a little narrower.Everyone uses the same settings to show how different they sound. If you want Chorusy then either will fulfill that, each has their own thing otherwise.A lot if YT demoers do the comparisons with everything at 9, noon and 3 Oclock. It drives me mad. I tried to get the LFO Rates the same, and use my ears to adjust the depth for 'similar' chorusing. I will do more. One thing that comes out of the comparison, to me, is that they both sound good, just different. So folks, save your money, just go and buy a cheap-as-chips HF2 or BF2 Anyone who has read any of my threads will realise I am absolutely fascinated by flangers and chorus's. It would be nice to do a side by side comparison of everything, but I have only 2 power supply outputs for 12v, and not enough patch cables. Also, my recording expertise and equipment is very basic. There were a lot of flangers using it in the late 70's including the EHX Electric Mistress, the MXR and the ADA. That's kinda where this thread started. CE1, EM, BF1, MXR, ADA and so on.
www.clinicaponce.com/galeria/files/colorado-timing-system-6-manual.pdf
You can chip in and help me out here, whenever you are ready In this first recording, I am showing the difference between the Boss BF1 LFO waveshape and the EHX Electric Mistress (Silver Flanger on the Strymon Mobius). I believe this is a fairly significant difference, because the Hyper-Triangular waveform of the Electric Mistress produces more fundamental frequencies, because it is not a basic sine wave. Following me so far. Well the significant thing your ears actually detect for the BF1 and EM set at the same LFO speed, is change in pitch. The EM will change speed at a faster rate, which produces more pitch shift. This next recording is just me noodling around with the BF1. It's a bit lengthy, but hopefully demo's a bit more of the BF1 character than you will find in any YT videos. The common theme here is the tinny, watery tone, which is present regardless of the control settings. The transition from VOX AC30 Blues to Soundcloud loses some fidelity, and gets compressed, but I hope you can still hear the wateriness. The site may not work properly if you don't update your browser. If you do not update your browser, we suggest you visit old reddit. Press J to jump to the feed.I generally keep the manual and resonance pretty low, around 8 or 10 o'clock. This dials out most of the jet swoosh sound and let's through a more liquid, less metallic tone. Both flangers can get into the liquid area, but the BF is heavier and HF is more, um, ethereal sounding. It's a good bit of movement on the signal but it is less intense. I like them both. At faster settings, low manual and resonance, mid depth, and high speed the HF can do a good Leslie type sound. It won't fool anyone, but it's pleasing. The BF doesn't sound as good with those settings, but if you add in some manual and res you can find a nice warbly lazer flange tone, similar to an extreme chorus. I dig both pedals and they are both excellent bits of flange. Both keepers for sure.
I liked to put the rate about 2:00 and everything else From the short period that I had the HF-2, BF-2, and BF-3, the BF-3 is the most versatile, but the -2s sound better. Not as metallic to my ears compared to most other flangers. I think it has a faster delay speed so the lower frequencies are filtered out of the flange effect. IDK about that, but it seems to be the concerns round the net. Also, I find the buffer on mine interesting. Bypassed, it affects the tone, but in a way I quite like. It seems to add a touch of compression without cutting much in the way of highs. I know that Boss buffers have changed through the years and I don't know if it's just this era or just my unit, but it doesn't sound like the buffers on other Boss pedals I have. Would love to know what is different with this buffer. Must find a schematic and do some homework. Personally, I could never see grabbing one as a standalone. I really want to know how you use them. I dig the David Gilmour sound, so I tend to keep them pretty subtle (low manual and resonance, mid depth and speed to taste). I like to keep them light and somewhat toned down so it doesn't overwhelm my signal, but I like the added movement and depth that they provide. I'm not really interested in the big jet swoosh or metallic sounds that they can get. But sometimes setting them to a faux ring mod is fun. All rights reserved Back to top. The 4 knobs (manual, depth, rate and resonance) allow the users to shape the sound as desired -- from dynamic jet-plane effects to short delay, chorus and vibrato sounds. Connect an oscilloscope to TP-1 test point. Rotate the MANUAL knob fully clockwise.Feed a 200Hz, sine wave, 0dBm signal into the INPUT jack. Connect the oscilloscope to Q3's emitter. While turning MANUAL across its entire rotation range, set VR6 for a clip-free waveform at the peaks.Plug short circuit into INPUT jack. Connect OUTPUT jack to an amplifier and speaker.
While touching a screwdriver to TP-2, set VR5 to the point where oscillation begins. Please do not offer the downloaded file for sell only use it for personal usage. Looking for other manual? For this no need registration. May be help you to repair. You could suffer a fatal electrical shock. Instead, contact your nearest service center. Note! To open downloaded files you need acrobat reader or similar pdf reader program. In addition, Also some files are djvu so you need djvu viewer to open them. These free programs can be found on this page: needed progs If you use opera you have to disable opera turbo function to download file. If you cannot download this file, try it with CHROME or FIREFOX browser. Translate this page: Relevant AUDIO forum topics: SilverCrest KH 2030 illetve 2029 rajz kerestetik Fent nevezett radiokhoz keresek rajzot, mivel a ket keszulek szinte azonos csupan annyi a kulonbseg hogy a 2029 tudja az rds-t mig a 2030 nem, szeretnem a 2030 ba is belecsalni az rds kijelzest ha van ra mod ehhez kernek segedelmet. Soundcraft MFXI8 zenekari kevero nem szol Sziasztok! Hoztak javitani egy 2,5 eves Soundcraft MFXI8 keverot. Termeszetesen mar nem garancias. A hibajelenseg az, hogy barmelyik savra dugok mikrofont, vagy vonal szintu jelet nem jon ki belole hang se a masteren, se az auxon. Ha bekapcsolom a fantom tapot annak sem vilagit a ledje es az effekt reszen sem vilagit semmi, csak a power led, a mute gombok ledjei, meg a solo. Sajnos rajzom nincs hozza, de tap hibara gyanakszom, csak nem tudom, hogy mekkora feszultsegeket kellene mernem. Azt nem tudom, hogy seged tap van-e valahol meg kulon, de a tappanelrol jovo vezeteken, csak ezeket a feszultsegeket merem. A tapon forr hibat nem latok, tranyok, diodak, ellenallasok jonak tunnek. Probaljak meg egy ujrakondizast. Bar mivel 2 eves mult, meg nem egy gagyi cucc, igy nem gondolnam, hogy kondi baj. A legrosszabb az, hogy rajz hijan azt sem tudom milyen feszkokat kellene keresnem.
TDA7365 os erosito IC re keresnek kapcsolast Szevasztok. A fentebb leirt ic re kellene nekem egy egyszeru kapcsolast,mert a googli n vagy rajz van,de nincsenek a labakSzert tettem egy cuki kis erositore, egy TDA 7264 dobog benne! Szoval az a gond, hogy kulsoleg van meg hozza egy CD-lejatszo, ami az egesz erositot vezerli. Olyan kabbellel van ossszekotve, mint ami a floppy meghajtoba megy (ket soros flat kabel). Arra gondoltam, hogy a CD-lejatszo nelkul jok kis erosito lenne, csak tudni kene a tuskek bekoteset! Ha vki tud segitesen! NEON NE1300 player erosito reszrol van szo. Similar manuals: You can write in English language into the forum (not only in Hungarian).