Status: AVAILABLE |
In order to read or download eic manual navy ebook, you need to create a FREE account.
Download Now! |
eBook includes PDF, ePub and Kindle version
| ✔ Register a free 1 month Trial Account. |
| ✔ Download as many books as you like (Personal use) |
| ✔ Cancel the membership at any time if not satisfied. |
| ✔ Join Over 80000 Happy Readers |
Most naval aviation insignia are also permitted for wear on uniforms of the United States Marine Corps.Personnel with multiple qualifications may wear only two insignia. Since September 2009, personnel with multiple designators within a single community (for example, an aviation officer who has earned both Naval Aviator and Naval Flight Officer qualifications) may wear both insignia, with their current billet's insignia on top.The EAWS designation may be earned by both enlisted Naval Aircrew and non-flying enlisted support personnel in Naval Aviation. EAWS status does not require any sort of actual flight experience or flight status in a flight crew capacity.The title was changed from Naval Aircrew (NAC) to Naval Aircrew Warfare Specialist (NAWS). Per MILPERSMAN 1220-020.Candidates must complete a positional qualification for the respective aircraft in which they fly within 18 months of reporting to a permanent duty station. See MilPersMan Article 1220-020. See further down this article for more on Naval Aircrew insignia. With the exception of the Naval Aviation Supply Corps insignia, all of the above insignia require the wearer to be, or have been, on some sort of flight status in naval aircraft. Naval Aviation Supply Corps qualification does not require any sort of actual flight experience or flight status in a flight crew capacity.The PAMO community consists of aerospace maintenance duty officers, aviation maintenance limited duty officers, and aviation maintenance chief warrant officers.This group is part of Navy Special Operations and all are dive qualified as closed circuit divers. It is the only decoration awarded to all four uniformed services of the US Defense Department.Officers formerly wore it as a secondary insignia under the Special Operations Warfare insignia, but now wear the Basic, Senior, and Master insignia as their primary warfare device.The insignia is earned by both officers and enlisted.
Upon implementation in September 2010, experienced Information Warfare Officers in the redesignated 18xx designators were afforded the opportunity to qualify for the IDWO Insignia through completion of an online course and the submission of evidence of prior completion of prescribed requirements. All Information Warfare Officers not being awarded the IWO Insignia via this method are required to complete the prescribed Officer PQS. The insignia became available for purchase in October 2010.Officers are required to complete all aspects of the enlisted program, plus additional officer specific requirements while overall demonstrating broader and deeper knowledge proficiency commensurate with their increased responsibilities.The insignias include SWCC Basic, SWCC Senior, and SWCC Master. The SWCC Basic Insignia is a two and one-half by one and one-fourth inch silver matte metal pin showing a background of a cocked flintlock pistol, a crossed naval enlisted cutlass, and a Mark V Special Operations Craft atop a bow wave. The SWCC Senior Insignia incorporates an upright anchor in the background of the SWCC Basic Insignia.In addition each person must be able to efficiently perform damage control and emergency control functions in each space on the submarine. The Submarine Qualification insignia for officers and enlisted was first proposed by then-Captain Ernest King on June 13, 1923, with the current design finalized March 1924.They are earned by those naval personnel who are trained and qualified to perform duties aboard United States surface warships. The Surface Warfare Officer insignia was first proposed in 1972, and by 1980 a variety of the Surface Warfare insignia had been approved for issuance.Enlisted personnel who complete the Enlisted Surface Warfare qualification program earn the Enlisted Surface Warfare Specialist (ESWS) insignia.
http://www.gwardiajuvenia.pl/zdjecia/fck/daihatsu-charade-1996-workshop-manual.xml
Enlisted members E-5 and above shall obtain the Enlisted Expeditionary Warfare (EXW) Specialist qualification while assigned to a qualifying unit. Enlisted members E-4 and below may voluntarily obtain EXW qualification while assigned to a qualifying unit and who meet eligibility requirements. The qualification was developed to provide a chance for enlisted sailors in the Navy Expeditionary Combat Command (NECC) community (naval personnel serving in a maritime security or maritime combat related role) to earn a warfare qualification. Core qualification skills will include but not be limited to weapons qualification and maintenance, marksmanship, land navigation, field communications, and expeditionary camp deployment. The design of the new pin encompasses the essence of enlisted expeditionary Sailors, presenting the bow and superstructure of a Sea Ark 34' patrol boat from Inshore Boat Units superimposed upon a crossed cutlass and M16A1 rifle. The waves represent the Navy's heritage, the cutlass represents the enlisted force, the M16A1 represents an NECC mission area and the boat, another NECC mission area. The background is the traditional waves of the Enlisted Surface Warfare Specialist Insignia.Navy Expeditionary Supply Corps officer qualification represents a level of expeditionary knowledge that distinguishes an officer of the Supply Corps from his or her peers. The Navy Expeditionary Supply Corps officer qualification program is mandatory for all Supply Corps officers serving in designated billets as determined by Commander, Navy Expeditionary Combat Command (COMNAVEXPDCMBTCOM) and Commander, Naval Special Warfare Command (COMNAVSPECWARCOM).The SSOWI is approved for wear by officers who have successfully completed the qualification requirements outlined in OPNAVINST 1534.1E. The insignia may be worn by:It is one of only three gold color breast insignia awarded to qualified enlisted personnel.It is issued to operators of small combatant and non-combatant vessels.
http://afreecountry.com/?q=node/4041
The Craftmaster insignia is awarded mainly to enlisted personnel commanding vessels, such as Landing Craft Utility, Landing Craft Air Cushioned, YTBs, and various other tugs and barges. It is also awarded to certain staff officers and a few select midshipmen.The basic insignia is issued for completion of basic parachutist training. The Naval Parachutist insignia is issued after 10 qualifying jumps. It is used both by the Navy and the Marine Corps.It is one of only three gold color breast insignia awarded to qualified enlisted personnel.The insignia represents completion of twelve months of fully qualified service to the NWS mission. A gold star mounted at the bottom of the insignia indicates an additional year of qualified service to the NWS mission.Such patrols were conducted during World War II and this insignia has not been awarded since that time. It is the successor to the Submarine Combat Patrol insignia awarded for submarine patrols during World War II.The first degree of the diving insignia is Scuba Diver. The remaining insignia are awarded for deep sea dive qualifications and are issued in the degrees of Second Class, First Class, and Master Diver. There also exists a Diving Officer insignia for officers who completed Basic Diving Officer course, and insignia for medical personnel who have qualified as both divers and medical response personnel to medical emergencies underwater.Not permitted for wear on dinner dress uniform (see figures 3 through 6).The badge is worn as an embroidered badge on jackets or displayed as part of a special agent's credentials (see figure 7).Retrieved October 16, 2009. Retrieved April 2, 2007. Retrieved November 18, 2007. Retrieved November 18, 2007. Retrieved November 18, 2007. Retrieved November 18, 2007. Archived from the original on December 2, 2007. Retrieved November 18, 2007. CS1 maint: archived copy as title ( link ) CS1 maint: archived copy as title ( link ) October 9, 2003. Archived from the original on December 2, 2007.
http://addi800.com/images/casio-3357-manual.pdf
Retrieved November 18, 2007. Retrieved November 18, 2007. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Force Fire Coordination Munitions System, an anti-armor version of the Tomahawk cruise missile,The extended ranges of these weaponsSupport into the Joint Force Land Component Commander?s deep battle. ItTheir technical expertise, guidance and focusVersion Intelligence (C 4 I) These advanced capabilities will requireAs weapon technological advancements haveCurrent joint doctrine addresses theForce Air Component Commander (JFACC), to command and control a wide varietyRegulations--Operations, provides that deep operations are actionsOperations are best conductedThis support was limited to shore bombardment, as even the formidable sixteenRecent technological developments may provideA number of proposals are being consideredSystem (ERGMS), a naval version of ATACMS, and an anti-armor version ofTesting of ATACMS from a shipNaval forces employ fireOperations. The supporting arms scheme provided is aimed at Amphibious. Task Force (ATF) operations and is not in perfect concert with the deepCommander (JFACC). The JFACC is generally designated by the Joint ForceThe evolution of the JFACC provides the impetus for the thesis researchThe establishment of a JFACC requires considerable resources. A JFACC mayThe Contingency Theater Air Planning. System (CTAPS) is the primary computer system for joint air operationsCTAPS is found at numbered. Air Force headquarters, Air Force wings and squadrons, Marine Corps wingsIf advanced NSFS will be providing significant fireConversely,Information Group Limited, 1996) 41. 3 U. S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, Joint Pub 3-56.1, CommandStaff, 14 November 1994), 1-1. 4 U. S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, Joint Pub 3-56.1, CommandStaff, 14 November 1994), 1-2.
Fire Support Systems Extended Range Guided Munitions (ERGMS), a naval version of ATACMS, andERGMS is expected to be operationally tested in late 1999, and thereforeSeveral missiles are being considered as options for development as a NSFSAs ATACMS is a mature weapon system, designed for land attack fire support,The program is officially described as ?a direct outgrowth of the Navy?sOne arsenal ship would, therefore, always beCurrent plansIt is found on cruisers andModern amphibious doctrine with the Landing Craft Air Cushioned (LCAC)The typical range of artillery is approximately sixteen nautical miles. Therefore the minimum desired range of the improved naval gun system isThe intent of the program is to exceed the minimum desired range of 41Accuracy of the ERGM round will achievedIt is planned for the payload to include 72 XM-80This systemThe advantages of this systemVGAS is in the concept stage, while ERGM and the 5-inch gun modificationMissile System Several missileThese include: the Sea Standoff Land Attack MissileThe aircraft terminal guidance requires significantHarpoon missile launcher which must be shared with Harpoon missile requirements,A demonstrationResults are not currently available.The advantage of Standard Missile is that it is already integrated intoIt was proven in Operation. Desert Storm and a naval version is to be tested from a VLS at White Sands. Missile Range, N. M. in late 1996. 16 Improved ATACMS are expectedIV, Anti-Armor Version Scene Matching And Correlation guidance features, and packs either a unitary.
It has been used successfully in Operation Desert Storm and in four contingencyNeed Statement was drafted by the Department of Defense for a forward-deployedLand Attack Missile Block IV, Anti-Armor Version (TLAM BLK IV(AA)), originallyThe planned improvements inThe SFW, developed by the Air Force, uses an infrared (IR) sensor combinedThe BAT, developed byRather than being dispersed over the actual targets, as is SFW and BAT,Reconnaissance System (JSTARS), Predator unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). U-2 reconnaissance aircraft, P-3 (AIP) maritime patrol aircraft, or otherBLK IV(AA) will be an effective addition to NSFS providing anti-armor capabilityNSFS weapons will ensure interoperability with other services and supportControl System. Due to its open architecture, high-order computer languageWarfare Control System (NWCS), to control all offensive weapons from aTactical Data System (AFATDS) to replace the Tactical Fire Direction SystemC 4 I system for the control of fire support. AFATDS is expectedThe Army has also developed the Automated Deep Operations Coordination. System (ADOCS) to process targeting data horizontally between systems andCorps systems has begun. A demonstration completed in Combined Joint TaskDemonstration (ACTD) is a project which has highlighted joint fire supportATWCS was able to receive, process, display, generate and disseminate TACFIREInformation Group Limited, 1996): 41. 18 Edmund R. Anderson, Jeffrey J. Barrat, and Craig R. Welterlen,It is the intentionA general review of service doctrine asFire support doctrineDoctrine is being established for naval fire supportBoard (JTCB). The JTCB is comprised of members of the JFC?
s staff, representativesThe purpose of the JTCB is to provideCLF is responsible for integrating supportingA joint agency is notArmy aviation, air assault and airborne forces, special operations forces,An ad hoc organizationTherefore, a Deep Operations Coordination Cell (DOCC)While the DOCC may be tasked to interface with the Joint Target Coordination. Board (JTCB), and may have liaison officers from the other services inIt is in targeting methodology whereThe targeting methodology is based on four functions: decide, detect, deliver,Naval Surface Fire Support (NSFS) weapons require a significant changeOperations, (Washington, DC: Department of the Army, 1 June 1996). Tactics, Techniques, and procedures for the Targeting Process, (WashingtonJoint Arsenal Ship Program Office, Naval Fires concept, and developmentThis area is one of the few whereThe overarching joint doctrine for fire supportMuch of the communication between interested parties is by e-mail and conferences. Therefore it will be impossible to keep abreast of all developments. ItWhile the JFACCIt is not the intentTLAM BLK IV(AA). These three systems represent the breadth of possibilitiesNo classified information willAs the relative vice the definitive impactAn added benefit of not using classifiedRather, it will use selected tactics and procedures for illustrative purposesThe transition from shoreProcedures (SOP) may not exist.
If we are to establishIf the impactThe methodology used to support this thesis was to use likely scenariosThe fire supportThese improvements will include extendedThis will require more sophisticated coordinationIn either case,It is expected that advanced NSFS systems will cause an evolution of jointThough it is difficult to forecastAll serviceA review of service fire support doctrineHowever, direct applicationAn examination of the few unpublished works with application to the presentThey generally fall into twoThe chapter will complete withThe subject is discussedThe intent is to provide theThe bibliography of this thesisStates, (Washington DC: Joint Chiefs of Staff, 10 January 1995):vi. Warfare of the Armed Forces of the United States, Joint PublicationThese publications provideJoint Publication (JP) 1-02, Department of Defense. Dictionary, Military and Associated Terms is the reference for theIt is in a draft whichIt is expected to be publishedIn operationsUnfortunately,Fires Coordination Cell (JFFCC) has been removed from the draft. It suggestedThough each operational situation would require a different level of support,This review provides operators with commonFire support control and coordination measures are defined, and serviceReview of the draft publicationThese include primarily Joint Publication (JP)JP 3-09 are Joint Publication (JP) 3-09.1, Joint Laser Designation Procedures However, these publicationsAll of these publicationsNaval Surface Fire Support. Though the focus is on amphibious operationsNSFS employment. In amphibious doctrine, fire support is handled as a subdivisionNSFS would be applied as part of the combat power used to enable the movementThe coordinating agenciesHowever, the need to integrate andFire supportFree-Fire Area (FFA), No-Fire Area (NFA), Coordinated Fire Line (CFL). Restrictive Fire Line (RFL) and other measures are defined in this publicationTechniques for theTherefore, this model could be used as a caseOperations.
These publications provide the context under which airProcedures for the establishment of joint organizationsMuch of the joint publication series providesAs is the caseHowever, reviewThis would indicate that integration and coordinationHowever, it is in Army deep operations where theManual (FM) 100-5, Operations. In FM 100-5, three sets of activitiesDeep operations are defined here, and the foundation laid for the establishmentManual (FM) 100-15, Corps Operations, and its associated tactics andAs the Joint Force Land Component Commander (JFLCC) is most likely to comeThe concentration ofThe DOCC has theBoard (JTCB), the corps targeting cell and the linkage with joint and organicTherefore, it is the DOCC whichIt provides a good overview of the organizations at echelons above corpsIt proceedsThe Army and. Marine Corps combined efforts to publish Field Service Regulations (FM)Coordinator (JFFC). As such, it is not, currently, an approved joint doctrinalJ-Fire was developed by the Army TrainingMarine Force Reference Publication (FMFRP) 2-72), the Air Force Air Combat. Command (as Air Combat Command Publication (ACCP) 50-28) and the CommanderInstruction (CINCLANTFLTINST) 3330.5). It provides a pocket-sized, quickNaval Surface Fire Support. Therefore, most of the doctrinal literatureThe study of NSFS, however, would not be complete without first reviewingThe keystone of this series is Naval Doctrine. Publication (NDP) 1, Naval Warfare. NDP 1 outlines the principles underIt describes the organization andThe organization,Marine Force Manual (FMFM) 2-7, Fire Support in Marine Air-Ground Task. Force Operations serves the same purpose as NWP 22-2 (Rev. C), whileThe emphasisCell (JFFCC). The paper recommends that the JFFCC should evolve into an. Engagement Integration Center (EIC). Combined service manuals, FM 6-20-10 andDevelopment of the JFFC conceptAn individualThere is littleHowever, there areBoth works use historicalFire Support.
Air Force commandersForce Commander (JFC) against interdiction targets which may or may notSome studiesOthers have focusedPerhaps, the real issue is what process shouldCoordination of these assetsFor this reason many studentsOften, the researcher will find that he or she is not the only person lookingHowever, some professional militaryAs such, this second category of professional military journals is a toolSome journals are found which supportIts editors publish articles from a wide variety of authors, including:A striking exampleSuch publications offer informationIn the third categoryLeague of the United States publishes Sea Power to keep its membersField Artillery,Army Field Artillery School, is used to disseminate professional knowledgeArtillery School, it appears to attempt a balance with articles from sisterThe October 1995 Sea Power, provides. Mr. Walsh updates the statusGiaquinto, L. L. McDonald and J. P. Madden, Jr. in the June 1995 Proceedings The few found in this research revolve around theAdvanced Research Project Agency (DARPA) and Navy program has been establishedThe case of the. Arsenal Ship emphasizes that the Navy will eventually have significantThe April 1993 edition dedicated seven articlesThe October 1993 edition emphasizedThis edition also provides seven other articlesWhile most of the authors argue for more capability,Navy to support a ground campaign. The focus of these documents is on theSpecifically, the Mission Needs. Statements (MNS) which support funding, and the Operational Requirements. Documents (ORD) which provide system requirements for acquisition provideThe MNS and ORDs for advanced NSFS systems make evident that the Navy isThis fundamental change has necessitatedJane?s Information Group Limited. Jane?s, as it is commonly referred to,The World?s Fighting Ships, first published in January 1898. The seriesCurrent products of the Jane?s Information Group Limited include: Jane?s. Defence Weekly, Jane?
s International Defense Review, and a seriesJane?s has reviewed the progress of the acquisition of advanced NSFS systemsAn exceptional summary of the current. Review. Proceedings 122 (December 1996): 44-47 There is no doctrine currently established for advanced naval surface fireThough doctrine forIn particular. Army doctrine which involves the application of fire support to deep operationsThe command and control structure which accomplishes the ground forcesThe Deep Operations Coordination Cell (DOCC) isNSFS. Current NSFS doctrine and tactics appear to be on the verge of aLittle qualitative or quantitative analysisEIC), especially with regards to the impact that advanced NSFS weaponsIn particular,Cell (JFFCC), due to the introduction of advanced Naval Surface Fire SupportExamination of both quantitative and qualitative factors will be accomplishedFirst a quantitativeThis comparison will beThe low volume fire support weapon,The second phaseThe primary factors considered will be the principles of war and how theThe impact of the low volume weapon systemAlso, a crude cost benefitHowever, consideration must be given to the relativeIn fire support, there are a number of quantitative factors which may beThese include:As the weapons effects of the systems to be compared are very similar,In assessing the need for coordination, it seems natural that the mostTherefore, developmentAnalysis, prepared by the United States Naval Academy Operations Analysis. Study Group, (Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press, 1977), 13. 32 U. S. Army, FM 100-5, Field Service Regulations--Operations,The potential target area of currentNSFS, and future ground commanders.
This data can then be compared to determine the relative impact of theOverlapping coverage will necessitateThis comparison willThese contemporary scenariosHowever, these are contemporary examples,Lesser contemporary conflictsHowever, theStaff, National Military Strategy, (Washington, DC: Joint ChiefsNSFS will be accomplished using the quantitative analysis for a basis. The principles of war will be used as the factors for consideration. EachThis is commonly referred to as the F-A-S. Test and applied to Course Of Action (COA) development. Feasibility asksThe key to this studyIn this case, ground and naval forces officers with requisite skills andThese officers wouldThey have little authority: rather they serve to facilitate informationLiaison officersNaval Gunfire Liaison Companies (ANGLICO) to encompass control and liaisonANGLICO Companies couldANGLICO Companies could be provided to ground commanders in the same mannerThe JFFCC would report toThis case is ambitious andThis situationThe doctrinalEstablished under the Joint Force CommanderThese include the Joint Targeting Coordination Board (JTCB), Joint Forces. Air Component Commander (JFACC), the Joint Search and Rescue CoordinatorThe JFACC accomplishes a function forCell (DOCC) for the Joint Forces Land Component Commander (JFLCC). BothThe JFFCC would performCoordination Cell organizations will be used to compare the Deep Operations. Coordination Cell structure and functionality with that of the Joint Force. Fire Coordination Cell. Review of the structure of the Supporting Arms. Coordination Center (SACC) will also be used for comparison as this organizationGeneral Staff College, February 1996), 3-2. NSFS and organic ground units.Naval Surface Fire Support on joint fire support operations, it is hopedThe development of a team (the. JFFCC) and its associated materiel support, will have a definite cost. The benefit of putting the team together must outweigh the cost.
Therefore, there is an inherent errorThis is consideredThere are many factors which would affect the application of surface fireTherefore, a number of assumptionsWhile one may argue individualU. S. naval gunfire weapon system (NGFS-P), the future U. S. naval gunfire It was assumed thatIt was assumedWhile it may be argued that this is not likely,The gun line didIn both the Korean and Vietnam scenarios, the baseIn addition, potentialThe base artillery line for Operation. Desert Storm was assumed to be at the line of departure for the groundThis is essentially the Saudi-KuwaitiThese considerations led to coiningAs discovered in Chapter Two, it does not appear that this type of analysisInformation Group Limited, 1996-1997): 618. 39 Jane's Naval Weapon Systems, (Alexandria, VA, Jane's. Information Group Limited, 1996): 41. 40 Jane's Armour and Artillery, (Alexandria, VA, Jane's. Information Group Limited, 1996-1997): 780. 41 Jane's Armour and Artillery, (Alexandria, VA, Jane's. Information Group Limited, 1996-1997): 781. The raw data provided in Table 2 leads one to the conclusion that the increaseThe increase in high volume NSFS alone is aboutThe limitations of geography would only allow groundA second observation is that advanced. NSFS would be the only surface fire support able to target the area aroundPTA could be influenced by NSFS. Table 3 provides the raw data. The ratioPTA is only eight percent for high volume systems and seven percent forAdvanced NSFS would radically change the CFA ratios. The ratio of future NSFS CFA to the future ground commander?s surface fireThe first is calculationsThe raw data for the two cases is provided in Tables 4 and 5. AnalysisThe subset as analyzed is interesting asThe small additional PTA which could be added to the NSFS figures at theThe first case reinforces the trend noticed in the Korean peninsula scenario,However, advanced NSFS could playAdvanced NSFS might have beenMilitary Regions One and Two.
Forces were able to capture the provincial capital of Quang Tri and threatenedIn Military Region Two, North Vietnamese. Armed Forces threatened to split South Vietnam in two at Highway 19, near. Pleiku. U. S. fire support may have made the difference in each region. 42 Region One north of Dong Ha, but could not engage the enemy on its northwestAs weather preventedTri and threatened to take Hue. NGFS was not a factor in Military Region. Two, where the South Vietnamese held at Kontum until a counteroffensiveIn the North Vietnam proper case, the ratioPTA is only three percent for both high volume systems and for the systemsSubset, except that the CFA is zero with present NGFS. The current NGFSVietnamese. The ratio of future NSFS CFA to the future ground commander?sNSFS on the fire support possibilities. As Kuwait Bay hampers the applicationIn this scenario, geography limits the impactHowever, advanced. NSFS would have been useful in covering the escape routes used by the Iraqi. Republican Guard. There has been much lament over their escape, N-ATACMSIraq, through which some of the Republican Guards traveled. Table 9 provides theAdvanced NSFS wouldThe ratio of future NSFS. CFA to the future ground commander?s surface fire support PTA increasesIraqi defenses in Kuwait. The potential target area increasedThe area that overlapsThe revised coordinated fire area as a fraction ofOtherwise, the lowest ratio is 0.41. The coordinatedIn three other scenarios considered: Lebanon, Grenada, and Panama; advanced. NSFS could range the entire area of each country. If the density of targetsThis might allow the joint commander to deployJoint and service doctrines recognize nine principles of war: objective,This section will address the relative value ofThen, the models will be assessed versus all the principles combined toThis method is similar to the method used to assess.